Part four: other role-players. - Free Online Library
1. INTRODUCTION
Government policy and strategies (see Part 1) specifically place
emphasis on the notion of integrated government, thereby involving other
government departments, as well as on partnership involving key
stakeholders--from the business community in particular. This section
contains four contributions, two each concerning the public and the
private sectors respectively.
Within the public domain, the active participation in the combating
of crime by local authorities especially within urban areas, is
emphasised. Hence the contribution by the Director of Communication:
Office of the Chief of Police, Mel Vosloo, on the Tshwane Metropolitan
Police that covers the roles, strategy, functions and key performance
areas of this police department at the local tier of government. At the
national level, within the broader context of the constitutional and
JCPS Cluster framework, the secondary functions and role of the South
African National Defence Force (SANDF) in co-operation with the SAPS in
combating crime are dealt with by Senior Staff Officer: Operations Land
Internal and Borderline Control of the Joint Operations Division of the
SANDF, Col Barry Schoeman. Apart from covering the statutory mandate of
the SANDF in this regard, as well as current levels of co-operation, the
main thrust of this contribution deals with shifts in the SANDF force
employment strategy as a result of which the 'support to the
people' role of the SANDF is compromised by the imperative of the
'promote regional security' role. This in effect means that
although the SANDF will always be available to be of assistance to the
SAPS, its regular force deployments in support of the SAPS are scaled
down in order to support the Government's regional peace
initiatives in the form of peace support operations.
Within the domain of the private sector, the 2003 Executive
Overview of Business Against Crime (BAC) provides an overview of the
major initiatives and activities of BAG in partnership with Government.
Established in 1996 as a non-profit organisation, the private sector
funded BAG played a major role in drafting the NCPS. Since then it has
been extremely active as a private sector partner to combat crime and
the causes of crime, mainly by operating at strategic and project
implementation levels and by interacting with the Government on
ministerial and departmental level within the JCPS Cluster. The
Executive Overview covers the approach and funding of BAC, as well as
the projects the organisation is involved in and its achievements in
respect of each project. The article by the Director of the Institute
for Strategic Studies, University of Pretoria, Prof Mike Hough, provides
an analysis of the private security sector in South Africa. Apart from
an overview of the kinds of services this sector provides, it
specifically looks at the official views on and statutory provisions
regulating the private security sector, in the process also assessing
whether private and public security in South Africa compete or
co-operate with each other.
2. THE POSITION OF KEY ROLE-PLAYERS
TSHWANE METROPOLITAN POLICE
Mel Vosloo
Director Communication
Office of the Chief of Police
Tshwane Metropolitan Police Department
1. INTRODUCTION
The City of Tshwane Metropolitan Police Department was established
on 24 January 2002 in accordance with a business plan approved by the
Council on 4 October 2001 and a proclamation in the Gauteng Provincial
Gazette by the Member of the Executive Council (MEC): Safety and
Liaison. The business plan described the vision, mission, values and
core business of the Department. The functions of the Department and the
additional resources and financial implications also formed part of this
business plan. The first phase made provision for the establishment of
the Department and the second for its progressive expansion until the
end of the 2002/2003 financial year. From this point normal Council
budgetary procedure applies.
2. ROLE OF THE METROPOLITAN POLICE
The role of the Tshwane Metropolitan Police Department is
determined by the needs and demands of its clients, the municipality and
the community, and to some extent by political responsibility and
strategies applied to meet the demands of the various role-players.
2.1 Client system needs
The escalating demand for a safe and secure environment due to the
high crime rate is the main reason for the existence of the Metro Police
Department. It is wrongly perceived that the Metro Police duplicates the
services rendered by the South African Police Services (SAPS). It has to
be stressed that the Metropolitan Police Department's focus is on
pro-active crime prevention in supporting the SAPS and on ensuring a
safe and secure environment, rather than acting on events. Due to the
high crime rate, all members of the community reserve the right to
demand a safe and secure environment.
2.2 Municipality needs
The establishment of the Metropolitan Police is directly linked to
the Municipality's mission to stimulate and nurture a safe
environment in which growth and development can flourish so that
everyone can experience quality of life. For this to happen it is
essential to meet the whole community's need for safety and
security; once this is in place the community can grow and flourish.
Notwithstanding this priority, financial constraints force the use of
alternative ways to deliver services. It is furthermore expected of the
Municipality to render an equal service to all residents. This
expectation has led to a shift in the priorities of the Metro Police
Department as well as a move towards addressing services that were not
rendered on an equal basis. As a result services have been
decentralised, leading to decreased reaction times in response to
complaints.
The Municipality expects clean administration from the policing
service. To spend the ratepayer's money with caution, this entails
tighter budget control and the strengthening of support services to
assist the operational management with accountability and effective
control over resources. Resource services supply valid up-to-date
management information including treasury services, logistical services
and personnel services.
2.3 Community needs
The needs of the community to live, work and play in a safe
environment is recognised as a high priority. This item first emerged
during the Integrated Development Plan (IDP) process. Tshwane prides
itself on being the safest city in South Africa. The community, however,
has limited resources to spend on safety and security and therefore
demands value for money and to be kept informed of all functions.
Ratepayers at all levels also want equality of services and should pay
for services rendered. Since policing is a basic service it should be
equal for all residents.
2.4 Political needs and demands
The political will requires a safe and secure environment for the
electorate: this promise was made by each and every councillor and
should be adhered to. Democracy generated new and sometimes unrealistic
demands. As a result the policing service finds itself at the centre of
the political process and often finds it difficult to attain its goals
due to political intervention. At the national level politicians are
placing more pressure on services in general. The national
government's policies force the policing service to consider
alternative ways of rendering services in public/private partnerships.
2.5 Accommodation of needs and demands
With the necessary resources and funding the police service has the
ability and dedication to render an affordable, professional and
efficient service. There are, however, several factors that make the
policing service unique and that require unique solutions. These factors
are the following:
--Most services are rendered on a 24-hour basis.
--The services are labour intensive.
--The services demand the use of expensive technical equipment.
--The client is dealt with under abnormal circumstances, for
example in an emergency situation or when guilty of an offence.
--The rendering of services requires a well-trained and dedicated
force.
The Metropolitan Police Service's ability to render a law
enforcement service resides in several strengths and opportunities, also
considering that the prevailing climate in a democratic South Africa
necessitates continuous changes. The foundations of the policing service
in this changing environment are the following:
--Most services are rendered in accordance with statutory
requirements.
--In some areas well-established infra-structure exists, which can
be extended to all other
Locksmith Cape Town areas.
--The personnel corps comprises well-trained and dedicated
professionals.
--Operational control is well established.
--The principle of functioning on a decentralised basis has been
anticipated.
--The metropolitan police concept is accepted nationally as well as
internationally.
2.6 Limiting factors
The main obstacles to the desired state of affairs are to be found
in the organisation itself. The first is to get rid of a culture of
average performance by replacing it with a goal-driven, responsible
culture. In this way existing resources can be utilised much more
effectively. This should be supported by scientific research and
technology, presently largely lacking. Secondly, specialised units with
different functions should be replaced with multi-skilled task forces.
For example, by-law enforcement across the whole spectrum should be
controlled by one section instead of by various sections scattered
throughout the Municipality. The luxury of separate traffic, security,
guard and crime prevention units cannot be afforded and these functions
must be combined in and executed by a multi-skilled task force.
2.7 Contributing factors
The strategic direction of service rendering on which the policing
service must embark, is supported by the fact that many services can be
delivered at the same standard but at a much lower cost than by private
organisations. This gives the policing service the ability to save on
costs and also the freedom to redeploy resources where they are needed
most. Another contributing factor is the fact that the improvement of
the level of services can be achieved internally by establishing
multi-skilled task forces, adopting a goal-directed management approach
and utilising research and technology. A final contributing factor is
the existence of the political will to address the safety and security
situation in Tshwane.
3. STRATEGY
In order to formulate a strategy, certain 'reality
clusters' were considered. Firstly, if the trust and sustained
co-operation of the community are to be gained and maintained, local
government has to ensure a clean administration which is visible to the
community. This Department has successfully maintained this vision,
supported by intensive media coverage of all suspensions and dismissals
of wayward staff. It has in fact given credibility to this process
publicly and privately by assuming a policy of zero tolerance.
Secondly, the Department has made inroads to as many community
forums as possible, including Community Policing Forums (CPF), in a bid
to stop possible vigilantism--a threat, that if ignored or minimised,
could be a serious mistake. It is the policy of this Department to
address community concerns as soon as possible and to stay involved
until the concerns are properly addressed. Failing this, vigilante organisations could develop into powerful forces that are organised and
capable of transgressing the law. Problems are dealt with by producing
reasonable and accurate statistics proving or disproving the
community's perceptions. An aggravating factor is that compared to
most other societies, South Africa's crime-infected society
requires above-average initiatives and sustained measures.
4. FUNCTIONS OF THE METROPOLITAN POLICE
The three main functions of the Metro Police Department are, inter
alia:
--crime prevention;
--by-law enforcement; and
--road policing.
All other functions of the Department support these functions.
The principle guidelines to operationalise the strategy are as
follows:
--decentralised command and control;
--crime prevention through community participation;
--reorganising patrol methods;
--community accountability and ownership; and
--increased service delivery.
The Metro Police Department is an inclusive service that functions
throughout the entire Tshwane area on an equal basis.
The minimum national standards stipulated by the South African
Police Service Act, 1995 (Act No 68 of 1995), section 64L are adhered
to. They deal mainly with:
--the carrying out of arrests and the incarceration of arrestees;
--the management of crime scenes;
--the standardisation of forms;
--occurrence books;
--pocket books; and
--search and seizure procedures.
4.1 Regionalisation
Policing in the Tshwane area was regionalised for the following
reasons:
--shorter reaction times;
--geographical obstacles;
--the fact that areas differ in crime patterns and statistics;
--infra-structural obstacles; and
--to coincide with SAPS precincts as far as possible.
Eight regions were eventually demarcated.
5. KEY PERFORMANCE AREAS
5.1 Office of the Chief of Police
The Office of the Chief of Police has to strategically manage the
Metropolitan Police in the following areas:
--crime prevention;
--by-law enforcement;
--road safety;
--to contribute to corporate strategy, initiatives and budget
responsibility;
--to provide strategic leadership in the above-mentioned areas; and
--to allocate, manage and optimise the use of resources.
5.2 Crime prevention
5.2.1 Social crime prevention
--Manage and oversee crime prevention programmes; and
--design, implement and maintain new crime prevention programmes.
5.2.2 Specialised crime prevention
--Manage and oversee specialised crime prevention programmes; and
--design, implement and maintain new specialised crime prevention
programmes.
5.2.3 Strategy development
--Manage and oversee strategies for crime prevention; and
--develop, test and implement new strategies for crime prevention.
5.2.4 Environmental design and re-design
Examine present environmental design and develop and implement a
new design that is safety and security friendly.
5.3 Policing
Manage and oversee:
--centralised policing operations;
--decentralised policing operations (regions); and
--road policing operations.
5.4 Road policing operations
Manage and oversee operations of:
--speed control;
--highway patrol; and
--specialised road safety services.
5.5 By-law enforcement
Manage and oversee:
--the by-law section by applying general management principles;
--the compliance of by-laws in all eight regions;
--the co-ordination of all by-law operations; and
--participation in the introduction of new by-laws.
5.6 Research and technology
--Gather data on crime trends;
--process data and disseminate information on crime trends; and
--investigate and activate new data sources.
5.7 Academy
Manage and oversee:
--the presentation of accredited statutory courses/own courses;
--the presentation of in-service training; and
--develop and implement new courses.
5.8 Support services
--Manage and oversee all administrative support services provided
to the Department; and
--develop, implement and maintain new support systems.
5.9 Administration Bureau
--Manage and oversee the administrative functions of the Bureau;
--develop and implement new strategies;
--monitor and control employee wellness;
--manage and oversee prosecution administration;
--maintain good relations with the Department of Justice;
--maintain and oversee the traffic court's functions; and
--maintain and oversee the tracing unit functions.
5.10 Licensing services
--Maintain and oversee the statutory licensing functions with
regard to motor vehicle licenses and registration, drivers'
licenses and inspectoral functions;
--manage trade licenses, NATIS system administration and archive
services; and
--develop, implement and maintain new systems.
6. CONCLUSION
The practical situation thus far is that the Department has
achieved most of its objectives. The only outstanding aspect, due to
slow processes that have to be followed, is the finalisation of the
appointment and placement of personnel in accordance with the structures
prescribed by the laws and policies of both the Council and national
government. The encouragement of personnel to comply with the vision and
mission of the Department is an ongoing process that is also receiving
attention.
THE SANDF AND THE COMBATING OF CRIME: MAKING A DIFFERENCE? *
1. INTRODUCTION
Before discussing the current or future level of co-operation
between the South African National Defence Force (SANDF) and the South
African Police Service (SAPS), it is important to draw attention to the
statutory mandate of the SANDF and its current employment by the
President. It is also important to gain an understanding of the current
dilemmas of the SANDF and of the political vision of the Government that
may impact on SANDF co-operation with the SAPS in the fight against
crime in South Africa.
2. THE SANDF'S STATUTORY MANDATE
According to the South African Constitution, 1996 (Act No 108 of
1996) section 200(2), the SANDF's main or primary function is to
"defend and protect the Republic, its territorial integrity and its
people in accordance with the Constitution and the principles of
international law regulating the use of force". The interim 1993
Constitution (article 227) also made provision for the secondary
functions of the SANDF. These functions, that were since reiterated by
the White Paper on National Defence for the Republic of South Africa,
1996 are:
--the fulfilment of the international obligations of the Republic
of South Africa;
--the preservation of life, health or property;
--the provision or maintenance of essential services;
--the upholding of law and order in the Republic in co-operation
with the SAPS; and
--support of any department of state for the purpose of
socioeconomic upliftment.
According to Section 201 (2) of the Constitution, the employment of
the SANDF in the undertaking of these secondary functions requires
presidential authorisation. The President has, in accordance with these
powers vested in him, employed the SANDF in three of these functions:
--Fulfilment of the international obligations of the Republic (the
deployments in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ethiopia and
Eritrea (all United Nations [UN]-mandated) and Burundi (UN-endorsed).
--The preservation of life, health or property (support to the
Department of Provincial and Local Government for disaster management).
--The upholding of law and order in the Republic in co-operation
with the SAPS (Presidential Minute 27 of 1996--18 June 1996--according
to the National Crime Prevention Strategy--NCPS).
This article focuses on the latter function. The intended 18-year
lifespan of the NCPS is to last until 2014, thus it is taken for granted that the employment will remain valid until then. Based on the
presidential authorisation, the Minister of Defence instructed that the
employment be effected in the entire area of the Republic of South
Africa.
3. THE CURRENT LEVEL OF CO-OPERATION PROVIDED BY THE SANDF TO THE
SAPS
Since the authorisation of its employment by the President in 1996,
the SANDF has mainly co-operated with the SAPS in three major fields:
--Borderline control.
--Rural protection.
--Combating of serious crime, namely:
--Urban terrorism (in the Cape Metropolis).
--Stabilising of areas where violence is endemic (in the
KwaZulu-Natal Midlands).
--The safeguarding of major events (for example, elections and
events of international importance such as the Non-Aligned Movement Summit and the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting).
The force levels deployed were compromises between the maximum
force level possible within the SANDF's budget constraints and the
requirements of the SAPS. In the recent past this has led to only the
priority requirements being catered for, which can be summarised as
follows:
--Borderline control. An average of 13 companies were deployed
along the Zimbabwe, Mozambique, Swaziland and Lesotho borders.
--Rural protection. An average of 23 Territorial Reserve Force
platoons were deployed.
--Combating of serious crime. An average of six companies were
deployed.
--22 Aircraft (fixed and rotary wings) and ships (primarily harbour
patrol boats) were used where and when required to support SANDF
elements, and on request to support SAPS elements.
Due to both political and financial constraints, the SANDF has been
withdrawn from all internal operations other than borderline and rural
safeguarding. Should the need for SANDF crime fighting assistance arise
within the urban or peri-urban areas, special motivations will have to
be provided and specific criteria met, before such assistance would now
be forthcoming. The force levels for the border areas have also
decreased from 13 to 11 companies. The excess forces are now used for
foreign deployments.
Despite these force reductions, the SANDF was still able to achieve
some notable operational results (see Tables 1 and 2).
It is clear that the SANDF plays a major role in combating crime in
these focus areas. The reduction in force levels inevitably impacted on
the results obtained and prevented the SANDF from providing anything
resembling blanket coverage along the priority border areas. This meant
in practice that the SANDF and SAPS local commanders were forced, more
so than before, to plan deployments to achieve reasonable results. The
results provide proof of the good co-operation between the forces,
especially at tactical level. Along the South African borders SANDF
patrols are not required to operate together with SAPS patrols, but in
practice this often occurs.
4. THE WAY FORWARD
The SANDF has now reached that critical point where decisions are
taken with consideration of the need to be active within the African
context. This is a political imperative and it also ensures that the
SANDF is ready to serve South Africa as required by the Constitution.
The current deployment of the SANDF within South Africa in co-operation
with the SAPS must be seen against this background. The choice forced
upon the SANDF is the product of budgetary constraints and the vision of
the Government to stabilise the Southern African Development Community
(SADC) region as a prerequisite for peace, progress and tranquility in
South Africa.
To deal with this problem the Department of Defence has, for the
first time in its history, developed a single comprehensive military
strategy to provide guidelines for future development and structures.
Using the military strategy as a basis, the SANDF has developed a force
employment strategy.
4.1 SANDF force employment strategy
The military strategy identified 37 missions derived from the
Constitution, the Defence Act, 1957 (Act No 44 of 1957 as amended) and
governmental directives, and also identified three military-strategic
objectives. The 37 missions were divided into the three
military-strategic objectives that are to be operationalised within the
force employment strategy. These objectives are:
--Support to the people.
--Promote regional security.
--Defence against aggression.
The force employment strategy covers an 18-year period, divided
into three phases of six years each. The strategy acknowledges the fact
that the dividing lines between the phases are not clearly delineated,
but are drafted for the purpose of presenting the strategy. According to
the force employment strategy, the 'support to the people'
objective is the most important objective for the first phase.
The 'promote regional security' objective is, however,
also important and is expected to replace the 'support to the
people' objective as a priority over time. Currently no immediate
threat is identified, thus the low priority of 'defence against
aggression'. If regional security can be promoted successfully all
three objectives will merge over time (see Figure 1).
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
The strategy makes provision for a Stage 1 where the force levels
allocated to co-operate with the SAPS will remain constant to a point in
time, after which they will decrease progressively or decrease as a
result of a growing requirement to promote regional security. The SANDF
will utilise SANDF force design capabilities and
commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) type of equipment to reduce the running
costs of the support provided. As the internal situation becomes the
SAPS sole responsibility, the SANDF role will change from intensive
deployments to a form of interactive missions utilising reaction forces
to stabilise the situation and so prevent specific illegal cross-border
movement and the plundering of economic resources. The strategy also
states that a multi-national approach needs to be followed to deal with
illegal border crossings. This means that as of now, and even more so in
future, the SANDF must in co-operation with the SAPS involve the
security forces of neighbouring countries to jointly combat illegal
cross-border activities. The SANDF internal role changes will not affect
its commitment to support other government departments, in particular
the utilisation of the SANDF planning capability during crises. The
level of involvement will be determined by the concept of selective
engagement. It is therefore important that permanent co-ordinating
mechanisms at all levels are maintained, staffed and improved to ensure
good co-operation between government departments.
4.2 Military strategic end-state
The strategy also developed a new military strategic end-state for
withdrawal from the internal situation that is summarised as follows:
--The internal situation is under control, which does not
necessarily imply that the crime situation has reached the desired
level, but rather that the SAPS can control it on their own.
--Appropriate technology and intelligence-driven operations to
allow for effective utilisation of resources to prevent:
--illegal cross-border movement;
--trans-national crime; and
--the plundering of resources.
--The SANDF's inherent capabilities are utilised to assist
other government departments at their request and cost.
4.3 Future SANDF co-operation with the SAPS in the future
The SANDF will scale down regular force deployments along the
borderline over the next six years. The process of handing it over will
be planned and step-by-step, as each party declares its ability to
transfer and to take over an area. The SANDF will always be available to
be of assistance to the SAPS or indeed other government departments
under certain defined circumstances.
The SANDF will also progressively exit from the rural safeguarding
environment. It will still continue to assist the SAPS when requested,
but these deployments will be to stabilise volatile areas and will be
high-density intelligence-driven operations of short duration.
The safeguarding of major events such as international conferences,
visits of foreign dignatories, and international sporting events will,
however, be managed at the cost of those who request it.
5. CONCLUSION
In conclusion, the main driver of the SANDF's strategy to
scale down internal deployments over the next six years is the need to
support the Government's regional peace initiatives. The effect of
this on the SAPS and other departments is recognised, but the SANDF does
not have the resources to simultaneously operate both internally and
externally at the level of commitment required by the Government. The
SANDF will, however, remain involved in internal operations for as long
as the SAPS is unable to operate without SANDF support or resources. The
SANDF will indefinitely remain on standby to be of assistance to any
department as is required by the Constitution, given that certain
defined criteria have been met. The use of the naval and air resources
of the SANDF by other government departments will, however, continue as
long as necessary as an essential cost-saving measure.
BAC EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW OCTOBER 2003
Business Against Crime South Africa
PREFACE
The major initiatives and achievements of Business Against Crime
(BAC) are described in some detail in this document ... (that also
includes) a number of recent highlights ... extracted to serve as a
quick reference.
Firstly, BAC has appointed a new Chief Executive Officer ... who
will build on past achievements whilst looking towards a greater
realignment with all stakeholders to ensure a future and continued
relevance. It is important for BAC to maximise its impact within
government beyond the current set of projects and to maintain the
ongoing support of business, and especially to secure support from the
black business sector.
The Partnership with government continues to grow in its
acceptance, influence and international recognition as a unique and
effective approach to addressing crime combating strategies.
The projects continue to achieve in excess of expectation, some
however are long-term interventions that do not deliver immediately
measurable results, nevertheless their achievements continue to be
recognised. A few of the most recent highlights are listed below:
--The Criminal Justice Strengthening Programme has successfully
completed its extended pilot on the restructuring of the manner in which
courts are organised and managed and will be rolling out its
Professional Court Management Model throughout KwaZuluNatal and Gauteng
during the remainder of this year.
--The Organised Crime Programme, focusing on Vehicle Crime, has
effectively brought the fraudulent re-registration of stolen vehicles
under control, significantly improved the control of border posts and
has been instrumental in the establishment of a special anti-hijack task
team by the South African Police Service (SAPS) that has significantly
reduced hijackings in Gauteng over the past three months.
--A special unit has been established to accelerate the
investigation, prosecution and conviction of bank and CIT robbers. In
the past two months more than 50 cases have already been prepared for
trial, many of which would most likely never have been tried. Through
the co-ordinated participation of all parties a greater number of
robbery attempts have also been foiled.
--The new Specialised Commercial Court Centre in Johannesburg hasl
increased conviction rates three-fold and the number of cases completed
by ten-fold, rapidly moving towards the improvements recorded by the
Pretoria Pilot initiative. This is soon to be followed by establishments
in Durban, Port Elizabeth and Cape Town.
--The Case Row Management system of the IJS programme has
effectively implemented its performance measurement systems, which has
already been rolled out to over 40 major courts, and is now able to
recognise and reward the achievement of top performing courts and also,
and more importantly, to identify under-performers and devise corrective
action.
--The Victim Support Programme through which victims of crime are
counselled both for trauma and in judicial rights and processes has
expanded the number of counselling centres to 157 from which some 80 000
victims are assisted annually.
1. INTRODUCTION
This document provides an executive overview of the activities that
Business Against Crime (BAC) is engaged in, and progress made in this
business-driven initiative that is managing the implementation of
measures, in partnership with government, to improve the effectiveness
of the criminal justice and crime combating process.
It is appropriate to review the origin and objectives of BAC in
order to place the activities and achievements in context.
2. BAC OVERVIEW
Business Against Crime was established as a non-profit
organisation, initially funded by its Founding Sponsors, in response to
President Mandela's request in 1996 "for the private sector to
partner the government in combating crime and the causes of crime".
Subsequent to this BAC companies were registered in each major province,
all of which focus on a common goal and provide implementation capacity
for the provincial roll-out of national priority initiatives.
The role that BAC fulfils on behalf of South African Business is
to:
--Influence crime combating strategy, policy and priorities.
--Transfer business skills to government without creating a
dependency.
--Show that business is visibly committed by creating a channel for
business involvement.
--Develop and maintain the public/private partnership, to shape a
mutually agreed vision and to drive working solutions that achieve
project goals.
BAC therefore supports the government as catalyst, facilitator,
consultant, project manager and capacity builder.
BAC's activities, in the role it plays, are funded entirely by
private sector sponsorships and donations whereas the capital and
operational cost of the criminal justice service is funded by the
government.
BAC is therefore not an alternative source of Government funding,
nor is it a lobby group and will not act on behalf of the Government.
3. HOW BAC OPERATES
BAC operates at strategic and project implementation levels and
interacts with government on ministerial and departmental level within
the 'justice cluster'. BAC does not take over the
responsibilities of government but rather provides additional skill and
focus to drive solutions successfully.
The BAC approach is therefore by means of clearly defined
strategies and projects that provide solutions to high priority crime
combating initiatives. The key projects, achievements to date and future
activity objectives, are summarised in this document. It is worth noting
that significant successes have been achieved in all areas of BAC
supported activity.
4. THE BAC APPROACH
The priorities for improvement in the delivery of the criminal
justice service have been set and are being addressed by the government
with BAC's assistance as described below.
Diagram 1 describes the focus of BAC's activity:
[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
There are six core project areas in which BAC is presently engaged,
which are:
--An Integrated Justice System.
--Commercial Crime and Fraud.
--Organised Crime--syndicated crimes.
--CCTV--Surveillance Systems.
--Service Delivery Improvement at police stations.
--Tiisa Thuto--conflict resolution and crime prevention in schools.
5. FUNDING OF BAC ACTIVITY
BAC, originally funded by its founding sponsors, extended its
source of funding to the broader based business sector to meet the
funding requirements of the scope of the initiatives listed above. Not
only do these contributions, which are in cash and in kind (business
skills), provide the much needed funding that enables BAC to positively
bring about change, but they are also an indicator of the commitment of
business to support the change process.
Current contributors fall into four categories:
--Founding sponsors and patrons, who provide core funding of BAC
activity in the range from R350 000 to R1 000 000 per annum over a three
to five year period.
--Major sponsors, who have committed in excess of R150 000 as a
single or an annual payment
--Sponsors and donors, who commit less than R150 000 as a single or
an annual payment. Payments are often made as a monthly contribution
--Partners, who contribute an initial fee of R25 000 and ongoing
maintenance support to BAC's SPPS Programme (Support Partnership
Police Station).
Funds are designated, at the sponsor's request, towards a
specific project or to the BAC initiative in general, where BAC directs
the funds in terms of specific, strategic or project needs.
BAC is fiercely results-oriented and sharply focused on adding
value, and is committed to providing regular progress reports in terms
of general and project achievements.
Sponsorship benefits, over and above participation in BAC public
activities include:
--Tax deductibility of contributions.
--Appropriate recognition and visibility in BAC's marketing
and communications programme and various crime prevention and
information-sharing initiatives.
--Presentations of analysed and evaluated current data.
6. OVERVIEW OF PROJECTS
6.1 Integrated Justice System (IJS)
The goal of the IJS is the transformation of the current Justice
System into a modern, efficient, effective and integrated process to
deliver swift justice through improved business processes supported by a
modern technology infrastructure across all criminal justice programmes.
The Programme will ensure that criminals are effectively managed through
the process of investigation, prosecution and incarceration and that
state resources are optimised and effective.
Special Achievements
To date, pilot implementations have produced benefits such as:
--96 infrastructural/process improvements have already been
implemented.
--IJS Court Centres--the implementation of court centres with
reengineered procedures have brought about several performance
improvements, including:
--the average time taken to prepare a case for trial has been
reduced by 40 per cent; and
--an improvement in cases disposed of by up to 124 per cent at one
court, with the national average showing a steady increase at 58 per
cent over the last 18 months.
--The Awaiting Trial Prisoner Project in Port Elizabeth--has
reduced detention cycle times by 28 per cent from 122 to 87 days,
thereby reducing costs by R8 million and relieving the overpopulation problem in our jails. Indirect annualised savings amount to R110
million.
--The disappearance of police dockets in Court Centres has reduced
from an average of 27 per month to NIL.
--The Criminal Record System--the availability of criminal records
improved in phase one from 97 to 35 day. Now with the AFIS (Automated
Fingerprinting Information System) this has been further reduced to
seven days.
Key future activities include the development and implementation of
the technology infrastructure, the business information system, the
integrated case management system and the further restructuring of
courts to improve workflow efficiency.
6.2 0rganised Crime
The Organised Crime Portfolio focuses on large scale syndicated
crimes with the major focus on vehicle theft and hijackings as well as
copper cable and cellular telephone theft.
The approach is to remove the commercial benefit from trading in
stolen vehicles and vehicle parts by preventing the illegal
re-registration or export of whole vehicles and the trade in second hand
parts originating from stolen vehicles.
This is being done by improving processes and information, by
uplifting skills and management, by countering corruption, by closing
down illegal operations and by ensuring that cases are properly
investigated and perpetrators effectively punished.
Special Achievements
--The rooting out of fraud and corruption and improving service
delivery at motor vehicle registration offices. Implemented at 30
registration offices in Gauteng, it is currently also operational in
selected offices in Mpumalanga, North West and Eastern Cape. The
so-called best practice model (BPM) is aimed at reducing the illegal
registration of an estimated 55 000 stolen/hijacked vehicles per year.
--To date over 200 cases of suspected fraud have been reported,
with several internal disciplinary actions brought about.
--Service levels have also improved, and at the main Loveday Street
registration office queue times have been reduced from three hours to
under a half hour.
--The various vehicle information data bases have been linked to
facilitate information sharing.
--Several vehicle recovery operations have been initiated,
co-ordinated and executed, involving various responsible departments, in
which over 100 criminal cases have been opened and 80 stolen vehicles
and 23 000 parts recovered in operations on vehicle 'chop
shops'.
--The increased vehicle identity verification programme by Border
Police had by the end of 2002, achieved successes in the seizure of
approximately 2 800 stolen vehicles at border posts, with a value in
excess of R220 million.
--A national roll-out programme will follow.
Key future activities include a Justice right-sizing initiative to
improve service delivery of the Department of Justice, a project to
reduce crime in the retail sector and a narcotics initiative.
6.3 Commercial Crime
The Commercial Crime project has created an environment for the
successful, effective and efficient investigation, prosecution and
adjudication of fraud and corruption which causes 30 per cent of all
business failures, consumes 3-5 per cent of turnover, affects 86 per
cent of South African business and costs the country upward of R40
billion per annum.
The project focuses on commercial specialisation, the principle of
prosecution-led investigation, workflow and productivity management
systems and controls and the development of professional skills through
training and mentorship programmes.
Special Achievements
--The initiative has produced excellent results at the Commercial
Crime Court in Pretoria.
--The number of convictions has increased from 15 per annum to 16
per month--a 1 200 per cent increase.
--A 92 per cent conviction rate.
--45 per cent of cases are finalised within one year compared with
three to five years previously.
--Court utilisation has improved, exceeding the national average by
22 per cent, and backlogs are down.
--Appropriate sentences are being passed--with 33 per cent of the
convicted being jailed without the option of a fine.
--Early achievements at the recently opened Johannesburg Commercial
Crime Court show a 100 per cent conviction rate during their first
quarter of operation.
--The major successes of the programme for prosecution by private
counsel, both in respect of successful prosecution and the transfer of
knowledge and capacity building of state advocates.
Key future activities include the continuance of the mentorship and
skills development programme for prosecutors and investigators, the
handover of the workflow and productivity management systems as well as
the technology implementation for the management of documentary
evidence.
Plans are already in place for the opening of Specialised
Commercial Crime courts in Durban, Cape Town and Port Elizabeth by the
end of 2003.
6.4 CCTV Surveillance
The Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) Surveillance Project designs,
implements and manages international-standard surveillance systems in
partnership with the SAPS, metropolitan councils and other law
enforcement agencies in major urban centres where street crime is
prevalent and law enforcement officers on the street have declined.
The core focus is the effective installation and operation of
infrastructure, procedures, management and skills development.
Special Achievements
--Surveillance Units have been established in Cape Town and
Johannesburg.
--ISO 9002 accreditation has been awarded for the documented
procedures as validated against the Johannesburg installation.
--The results have seen a decline of 80 per cent in street crime in
areas covered in the Cape Town CBD with an equivalent improvement being
recorded in Johannesburg in the first year.
--Responses of SAPS reaction units to the crime scene are now less
than one minute.
--Video footage of crimes has been accepted as prima facie evidence in court.
--The many successful sightings of criminal activity that have
resulted in the arrest and conviction of the perpetrators.
Key future activities include the extension of Surveillance
Technology implementations to other major centres in Gauteng and other
provinces.
6.5 Service Delivery Improvement in Police Stations
The objective of the Support Partnership for Police Station
Programme (SPPS) is to support one of the SAPS' four strategic
priorities of service delivery improvement by bringing business
expertise and resources in a planned, measurable and sustainable way to
a police station with the objective of capacitating its members thereby
enabling them to render an improved service to the communities they
serve.
The SPPS brings a business to partner with a police station for the
benefit of the community represented in the partnership by the Community
Police Forum, the process being initiated, facilitated, guided,
monitored and evaluated by Business Against Crime.
Based on the model below (Figure 2) the programme focuses and
evaluates the partnerships on addressing and achieving a set of criteria
that would most impact on the service received in the areas of a police
station most utilised by the community.
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
Special Achievements
--The programme has inducted 49 partnerships in Gauteng since 1998.
--The programme commenced in Mpumalanga during 2002 and to date 15
partnerships have been inducted in that province.
--Eight Community Service Centres (formerly Charge Office) have
been renovated.
--Three training rooms have been equipped.
--10 Victim Support facilities have been equipped.
--13 stations have had training in telephone skills.
--A variety of other interventions such as computer literacy,
Powerpoint presentation skills, driver training, absenteeism reduction,
workshops with prosecutors, have taken place in different stations.
Key future activities include:
--Focussing all partnerships simultaneously on the same set of
service delivery improvement criteria during 2003.
--The introduction of an evaluation process during 2003.
--Extending the programme to all 121 police stations in Gauteng.
6.6 Victim Support Programme
The Victim Support Programme run by the SAPS in conjunction with
Business Against Crime has steadily expanded since its inception four
years ago. Until recently victims of crime and violence had neither
recognised rights nor adequate recourse to the criminal justice process.
Recognising this, government launched the National Crime Prevention
Strategy (NCPS) Victim Empowerment Programme. This provided a link for
the first time between the work of departments such as the SAPS, Social
Development, Health, Justice and Correctional Services in partnership
with non-governmental and community based organisations.
Victims of crime and violence suffer emotional trauma, which often
results in psychological and physical symptoms. Volunteers are trained
to provide support through the criminal justice process--from the time
of the initial reporting of the crime at the station to the closing of
the case, which includes:
--basic practical and emotional support;
--to recognise post-traumatic stress symptoms; and
--to refer traumatised victims (who may require professional
counselling)
to appropriate services providers in the community.
Special Achievements
--The original Victim Support Programme has been improved,
internationally benchmarked and reprinted. 2 500 Volunteers have been
recruited and trained to work in 120 operating centres that today manage
more than 5 000 cases of victimisation monthly.
--Over 1 000 participants have been exposed to the Partnership
programme and experience gained is being used in the further development
of the programme. A performance measurement system is in the progress.
Future Activities
The programmes currently running in Gauteng, Mpumalanga,
KwaZulu-Natal and the Eastern Cape, will be rolled out nationally over
the next 12 months.
6.7 Tiisa Thuto
Tiisa Thuto meaning, 'We Strengthen Education' has as its
main objective the development of a positive morality, improved
interpersonal relationships and a reduction in the levels of crime at
schools so that teaching and learning can take place more effectively.
This is achieved by working with learners, educators, parents and the
local police towards nonviolent methods of conflict resolution and
problem solving.
The project was introduced in 44 schools (four communities) in
Soweto and has produced not only a significant improvement in individual
educational achievements but also a reduction in crime, improvement in

moral standards and the more effective operation of communities in
general.
Special Achievements
The project has been independently audited and the following
achieve highlights recorded:
--Pass rates are up in Thiisa Thuto schools by an average of 78 per
cent on 1999, with 100 per cent being reported in some schools.
--There has been a 70 per cent increase in attendance at school
initiated activity.
--Communication between teachers and parents has risen from 0 per
cent to 28 per cent.
--Home discipline has improved.
--Teachers and School Governing Bodies have tackled as much as 87
per cent of crime-related issues.
--Acts of aggression and violence are down by 72 per cent.
As a result of these achievements the United Nations Development
Programme (UNDP) has endorsed the programme by adopting the model as the
standard to be rolled out nationwide.
Key future activities
The rollout phase is currently under way and has reached the
following areas:
--Gauteng: 312 schools in Tshwane, Katlorus (East Rand), Alexandra
and Orange Farm.
--Limpopo: 162 schools in all 30 districts.
--Free State: 12 schools in Villiers, Frankfort and Steynsrus.
--The Western Cape, Eastern Cape and KwaZulu Natal are to be
implemented in 2003.
6.8 Criminal Justice Strengthening Programme (CJSP)
The Criminal Justice Strengthening Programme is a strategic
partnership initiative, managed by BAC and funded by USAID, aimed at
supporting and strengthening the capacities of the Department of Justice
and Constitutional Development's (DOJCD) core business function
(that is Prosecution, Court Services and Adjudication) as well as their
support services (for example financial operations, the Justice College)
and the related strategic alliances (that is SAPS, DCS, DSD), in order
to provide all South Africans more effective and accessible justice
whilst maintaining citizen confidence in democratic governance.
The CJSP is made up of four sub-programmes.
Court Services
--The Decentralised Court Support Services Project focuses on the
development and implementation of an organisational structure for the
effective management of shared services and non-shared (core) functions
to get cases to flow and be adjudicated timeously.
--The Integrated Case Flow Management System will develop a
business process to streamline and integrate all relevant aspects of a
case as it moves through the value chain.
SOCA (Sexual Offences and Community Affairs) Programme includes:
--Awareness Campaigns to make women and children aware of their
basic human rights.
--Case Managers to fast track the case flow through the system.
--Victim Assistance Programme to help strengthen the capacities of
victims.
--The development of a Sexual Offences Training Guide.
--The development of a Domestic Violence Training Guide.
--Management Development Programme to teach strategic management,
leadership and project management in the SOCA environment.
Justice College
--Tutor Training Project aimed at providing basic skills and to
broaden the perspectives and widen the horizons of the prosecutors and
magistrates in previously disadvantaged areas.
Outsourcing of Trust Fund Management
--Outsourcing to organisations better geared to dealing with the
receipt and payment of high volumes of cash.
PRIVATE AND PUBLIC SECURITY IN THE RSA: COMPETITION OR
CO-OPERATION?*
Prof Mike Hough
Director: Institute for Strategic Studies
University of Pretoria
1. INTRODUCTION
Various factors have led to the phenomenal growth of the private
security industry in South Africa. The increase in crime, as well as
perceptions and realities regarding the efficient functioning of the
South African Police Service (SAPS), and metro policing, are among the
main factors in this regard. More recently, attention has been focused
on improving the regulation of the private security industry, and
increasingly appeals are made for closer co-operation between the SAPS
and private security. It remains to be seen whether increased efficiency
on the part of the SAPS or the introduction of metro policing in cities
where this does not yet exist, will diminish the need for private
security.
In this article, an overview of the private security sector in
South Africa and the kinds of services rendered, is given; followed by
selected official South African views on private security and current
initiatives to regulate the industry. This is followed by an assessment
of the current as well as potential role that private security could
play in combating crime.
2. INDIVIDUAL SECURITY AND NATIONAL SECURITY
Increased emphasis on the concept of 'human security',
and at times even equating it to national security, has meant that crime
has been recognised as one of the obvious threats to human security.
However, it is often, from a human security and/or a national security
point of view, not combated effectively.
The two basic components of human security are freedom from fear
and freedom from want. Threats to human security are listed as being
threats to the following areas (although they tend to overlap), namely
economic security, food security, health security, environmental
security, personal security, community security and political security.
Each of these are seen to require certain conditions, such as a basic
income, and physical and economic access to basic food. (1))
Part of the problem regarding an excessive focus on human security
is its affordability to the state. Has the threat to individual security
reached the stage where it has already, or may soon, become a threat to
national security? To what extent does the state have a definite legal
obligation to provide aspects of human security; and what is the
distinction between the causes, potential causes or potential
manifestations of threats to national security and the actual
manifestations of these threats? These are often confused.
Threats to human security, such as poverty, could therefore exist
without this necessarily manifesting (or even potentially manifesting)
as a threat to national security. It has been argued that only if a
certain condition or situation leads to violence, unacceptable conflict
or state instability, or has the clear potential to do so (including
existing indications to this effect), could it possibly be viewed as a
national security threat. In this regard, threats to law and order are
not necessarily threats to national security, nor is normal national or
international competition. The intensity, extent and consequences of for
instance violent crime, will determine in a given situation whether it
is a threat to individual security and law and order, or also a threat
to national security. It has of course also been said that a threat is a
threat to national security when a government says it is. This is,
however, insufficient, as governments often list priorities for the sake
of political expediency, or under- or over-emphasise certain threats.
Threats or potential threats from the same source, for example the
environment, may pose a threat to individual security only, or to
individual and national (and possibly also global) security.
In the Third World context specifically, it has been argued that
threats to national security must ultimately have a political dimension.
(2)) Although the concept of "security software" is especially
important in the Third World context, over-emphasis of this dimension
could lead to utopian thinking, particularly when divorced from national
security.
Despite the difficulty of finding a universally acceptable
definition of human security and its link with national security, the
Memorandum of Understanding on Security, Stability, Development and
Cooperation in Africa (CSSDCA--July 2002) stipulates that by 2005, a
framework for codifying the concept of human security into national laws
as contained in the CSSDCA Solemn Declaration, should be established.
(3))
As far as the latter is concerned, it is inter alia stated that:
(4))
(b)The concept of security must embrace all aspects of society
including economic, political and social and environmental dimensions
of the individual, family, and community, local and national
life. The security of a nation must be based on the security of
the life of the individual citizens to live in peace and to satisfy
basic needs while being able to participate fully in societal affairs
and enjoying freedom and fundamental human rights.
The above does not specifically refer to the concept national
security (although it refers to stability), and obviously takes a wide
view of security with the emphasis on human security.
Definitions of 'human security' (although the concept has
obvious merits), have been criticised for often being too vague and
wide, and that virtually any type of threat or even discomfort, could
constitute a threat to human security. It also does not help
decision-makers in deciding on the allocation of scarce resources among
competing goals if no hierarchy of security objectives is established.
"After all, not everything can be a matter of national security
with all of the urgency that this term implies". (5))
An over-emphasis of human security can also create false priorities
and a false sense of hope, as well as false assumptions, as the
alleviation of human insecurity does not necessarily mean greater peace
and security. (6)) Many 'human security' issues are in fact
service delivery issues, some at local level.
Human insecurity is often at least partially the result of bad
governance or an emphasis on regime security instead of national
security. Buzan also pertinently states that national and international
security cannot be reduced to individual security. The pursuit of
individual security may also lead to conflict with the state, and
individual security may be affected both positively and negatively by
the state. (7))
Although all threats to human security are not automatically
threats to national security, crime for instance is often not
sufficiently viewed as a threat to human security, or in some instances
to both human and national security. In the case of South Africa, it
could be argued that crime is a serious threat to both individual
security and to national security. Recognising this as such is, however,
only a first step, as an unacceptable gap often exists between policy
and effective implementation.
It is therefore clear that while countering all threats to
individual security lies beyond the capacity of the state, despite
undertakings contained in the Bills of Human Rights, certain basic state
functions and responsibilities do exist. One of the prime functions in
this regard is to provide an acceptable level of national and individual
security. Whether due to a lack of resources on the part of the state; a
lack of political will; inefficient service provision; increasing crime
levels; or a need for added security, those that can afford it have
increasingly been making use of private security, also in South Africa.
3. THE PRIVATE SECURITY INDUSTRY IN SOUTH AFRICA: EXTENT AND ROLE
Private security has been described as "those efforts by
individuals and organisations to protect their assets from loss, harm or
reduction in value, due to criminality". (8)) In this regard, the
protection of assets in the business, commerce and industry environment
is the basic function of private security. These assets may include
people, fixed and immovable property, business rights, information,
contracts, etc. Private security though, also plays a role in the
protection of private individuals and their property on a client basis.
The above functions are performed by managing the potential or actual
losses incurred by, or resulting from crime. Crime prevention, also in
the form of deterrence, as well as investigations, may constitute part
of the function.
The Private Security Industry Regulation Act, 2001 (Act No 56 of
2001) provides an extensive list of services qualifying as security
services. The Act defines security services as meaning one or more of
the following services or activities:
(a) Protecting or safeguarding a person or property in any manner;
(b) giving advice on the protection or safeguarding of a person or
property, or on any other type of security service as defined in this
section, or on the use of security equipment;
(c) providing a reactive or response service in connection with the
safeguarding of a person or property in any manner;
(d) providing a service aimed at ensuring order and safety on the
premises used for sporting, recreational, entertainment or similar
purposes;
(e) manufacturing, importing, distributing or advertising of
monitoring devices contemplated in section 1 of the Interception and
Monitoring Prohibition Act, 1992 (Act No. 127 of 1992);
(f) performing the functions of a private investigator;
(g) providing security training or instruction to a security
service provider or prospective security service provider;
(h) installing, servicing or repairing security equipment;
(i) monitoring signals or transmissions from electronic security
equipment;
(j) performing the functions of a locksmith;
(k) making a person or the services of a person available, whether
directly or indirectly, for the rendering of any service referred to in
paragraphs (a) to (j) and (l), to another person;
(l) managing, controlling or supervising the rendering of any of
the services referred to in paragraphs (a) to (l);
(m) creating the impression, in any manner, that one or more of the
services referred to in paragraphs (a) to (l) are rendered. (9))
A security service provider is defined as "a person who
renders a security service to another for a remuneration, reward, fee or
benefit and includes such a person who is not registered as required in
terms of this Act". It has to be noted that in terms of the Act,
all in-house security officers are also obliged to register as well as,
for example, private investigators. (10))
A broad distinction can be made between contract security and
in-house security as far as the private security industry in South
Africa is concerned. Three types of services are basically provided,
namely a guarding service, an armed response service, and
cash-in-transit operations. (11))
Larger organisations may have in-house security, which refers to a
security department, protection department or risk management structure
within the organisation itself. Contract security may be combined with
inhouse security, with each performing specific functions. Some mining
houses, local authorities and financial institutions, for instance, make
use of in-house security. The trend, however, is to outsource guarding
services specifically to contract security. (12))
In addition to being providers of certain services, the private
security industry also provides a range of electronic and other security
equipment such as intrusion detection equipment, vehicle security
systems and access control systems. Finally, private investigations and
industrial espionage and counter-espionage are also functions provided
by certain individuals or companies in the private security sector.
(13))
By August 2003, the private security industry had 250 852 active
security officers, and 4 271 registered security businesses. The
industry has been growing at a rate of 12,5 per cent per annum over the
last five years, and was estimated to have an annual turnover of R13
billion by 2003. Foreign investment in the industry is estimated to be
more than R3 billion. (14)) A wide variety of services are rendered, and
the categories of services registered with the Regulatory Authority are
indicated in the table below. A security business may render any number
of these services.
The ratio of active private security personnel to uniformed police
officers in South Africa is approximately 2,5:1. (15)) This is based on
a total number of uniformed police of 101 022 by October 2002. (16))
4. SELECTED OFFICIAL SOUTH AFRICAN VIEWS REGARDING THE PRIVATE
SECURITY INDUSTRY
Before discussing the contribution of South Africa's private
security industry to the prevention and combating of crime, and the
possibility of closer co-operation with the SAPS, some official views on
the private security industry first need to be considered. It is clear
that the South African authorities have, for various reasons since 1994,
tended to harbour some reservations about private security.
During 1995, although crediting private security with the role
played at for instance a number of public buildings and airports
following the privatisation of security, the then Deputy Minister of
Intelligence Services, Joe Nhlanhla, stated the following: (17))
Concern, however, is expressed over allegations against a number
of private companies, particularly in strife-torn areas, suspected
of being involved in criminal and unconstitutional activities.
Government is also concerned about the training of units, hit squads
and private armies that are involved in the massacre of people.
It is the legitimate right of companies to train bodyguards and
installation guards.... But, there is the perception that third force
elements see the private security industry as a haven from where
to continue their third force activities of destabilisation.
It does seem that some private security firms are being used
as cover for arms trade, rhino-horn smuggling, drug trafficking
and illicit diamond dealings both in South Africa and beyond
international borders. Industrial espionage seems to be a new
area of interest.
Some reservations regarding the role of certain "private
security and intelligence companies" were also expressed by the
South African Coordinator for Intelligence, Linda Mti, during 1997. He
stated that: (18))
Some of the greatest concerns that exist in respect of private
security and intelligence companies revolve around the following issues:
--the weaponry they have in their possession;
--their historical links with the previous regime's security
services;
--the involvement of anti-government elements who are using the
infrastructure of the industry to train, equip, channel and manage
anti-constitutional and criminal activities;
--the connections some of the actors in the private security
companies have with foreign intelligence services and the similarity of
objectives informed by their past co-operation in the Cold War era, ...
which makes them free agents to be exploited for espionage activities;
and
--their mercenary-type role in foreign affairs.
From an intelligence perspective, which is not driven by profit or
commercial interest, these activities bring the entire private security
industry into disrepute. While that is the case, it is known that many
of the companies and individuals involved in the industry are patriots.
They can be relied upon when it comes to the defence of South
Africa's national sovereignty and territorial integrity. Thus they
are intent on cleaning up the industry. In co-operation with private
companies, including private security companies, these patriots form a
crucial building block in the campaign of waging war against crime.
Mti made some distinction between what he called private security
companies and private intelligence companies, and pointed out that no
legal provision is made for the latter, although the Interception and
Monitoring Prohibition Act, 1992 (Act No 127 of 1992) is relevant in
this regard. His concern over private intelligence was expressed as
follows: (19))
In order to remain competitive, most successful business ventures
have established and operate their own intelligence capabilities to
identify opportunities and to protect their production processes
and technologies. Their existence is understood, not condoned.
What is objectionable is the development of covert collection
capabilities by private intelligence companies, and their use of
these capabilities in total disregard of the Constitution and other
legislation. This is cause for concern.
The General Intelligence Law Amendment Act, 2000 (Act No 66 of
2000) also places restrictions on the employment of members of the
National Intelligence Agency (NIA) or the South African Secret Service
(SASS) in the private security industry for a period of three years
after leaving the Agency or the Service unless a clearance certificate
is provided by the Director-General. (20))
During 2000, official concern over the role of some private
security companies was again expressed. The Director-General of NIA
stated that quite a few of these companies are "intelligence
companies", parading as research or investigation institutions. The
Joint Standing Committee on Intelligence (JSCI) was investigating ways
to exercise some or other form of control over these companies. (21))
In a subsequent development the Chairperson of the Parliamentary
Portfolio Committee on Safety and Security spoke out strongly against
foreign involvement in the private security industry in South Africa. It
was reported that during 2000 alone, foreign companies had invested more
than R1,7 billion in buying security companies in South Africa. The 11
September 2001 terror attacks in the United States (US) seemed to have
played a major role in the South African government's view on
foreign ownership of private security in South Africa. (22)) In the
Private Security Industry Regulation Act, 2001, the requirements for
registration subsequently included that only citizens or permanent
residents of South Africa may apply for registration as security service
providers. (23)) The same applies to a security business. Foreign
investment in such a company remains admissible.
5. REGULATING THE PRIVATE SECURITY INDUSTRY IN SOUTH AFRICA
The Security Officers" Act, 1987 (Act No 92 of 1987) created a
now defunct statutory body, the Security Officers' Board, to
exercise control over the occupation of security officers, and also
provided for the compulsory registration of all contract security
officers with the Board. The Board could take such steps as were
necessary to maintain standards and regulate practices for security
officers. It also took measures deemed expedient or necessary in
connection with the training of security officers, the determination of
the standards of such training, and the promotion of the maintenance of
those standards. (24))
Regulations were promulgated in 1992 relating to the training of
security officers, the levels of training and content of courses being
determined by the Board. Following training, security officers are
graded from A (highest) to E (lowest). A security service may not be
rendered by an employee of a private security firm unless the employee
is in possession of a training certificate issued by the Board. (25))
The Security Officers' Amendment Act, 1997 (Act No 104 of
1997) replaced the Security Officers' Board with a Security
Officers' Interim Board, which continued the functions of the
previous Board. In addition, it advised the Minister of Safety and
Security on the establishment of a restructured permanent board. (26))
During 2001, the Private Security Industry Regulation Act, 2001 was
adopted by Parliament, and signed by the President in January 2002,
replacing most of the provisions of the Security Officers" Act,
1987. The aims of the Security Industry Regulatory Authority established
in terms of the new legislation, are as follows: (27))
3. The primary objects of the Authority are to regulate the
security industry and to exercise effective control over the practice of
the occupation of security service provider in the public and national
interest and the interest of the security industry itself, and for that
purpose, subject to this Act, to--
(a) promote a legitimate security industry which acts in terms of
the principles contained in the Constitution and other applicable law;
(b) ensure that all security service providers act in the public
and national interest in the rendering of security services;
(c) promote a security industry which is characterised by
professionalism, transparency, accountability, equity and accessibility;
(d) promote stability of the private security industry;
(e) promote and encourage trustworthiness of security service
providers;
(f) determine and enforce minimum standards of occupational conduct
in respect of security service providers;
(g) encourage and promote efficiency in and responsibility with
regard to the rendering of security services;
(h) promote, maintain and protect the status and interests of the
occupation of security service provider;
(i) ensure that the process of registration of security service
providers is transparent, fair, objective and concluded timeously;
(j) promote high standards in the training of security service
providers and prospective security service providers;
(k) encourage ownership and control of security businesses by
persons historically disadvantaged through unfair discrimination;
(l) encourage equal opportunity employment practices in the
security industry;
(m) promote the protection and enforcement of the rights of
security officers and other employees in the private security industry;
(n) ensure that compliance with existing legislation by security
service providers is being promoted and controlled through a process of
active monitoring and investigation of the affairs of security service
providers;
(o) protect the interests of the users of security services;
(p) promote the development of security services which are
responsive to the needs of users of such services and of the community;
(q) promote the empowerment and advancement of persons who were
historically disadvantaged through unfair discrimination in the private
security industry.
Furthermore, Section 28 of the Act provides for a legally binding
code of conduct for security service providers. (28)) It should also be
noted that under the Criminal Procedure Act, 1977 (Act No 51 of 1977),
security officers enjoy the same powers of arrest as ordinary citizens
(29)) (unless they are contracted to perform duties at national key
points).
6. THE CURRENT AND POTENTIAL ROLE OF THE PRIVATE SECURITY INDUSTRY
IN COMBATING CRIME
6.1 Current role
The current role of the private security industry in South Africa
as far as the combating of crime is concerned, is linked to the reasons
for the growth of the industry and the advantages of private security
compared with official policing. It should, however, be borne in mind
that private security is not intended to replace official policing.
(30))
--While the police service has to operate under public service
regulations, private security is more flexible as it can be more readily
adjusted to changing consumer demands.
--Public perceptions of police inefficiency and slow response times
have translated into an increased demand for private security.
--Private security has become more visible than the police
currently, and in this sense a pro-active deterrent role regarding the
combating of crime is fulfilled. It is also specifically focused on
protecting a specific victim. Official policing has increasingly tended
to become reactive.
--The huge market for industrial, commercial and residential
security in South Africa, means that the police cannot meet the demands
due to its limited resources, and are for instance incapable of
producing visible security on a 24-hour basis in most instances.
--Access control and the development of mass private property such
as large shopping centres, have generated an increased need for security
which the police mostly cannot provide.
--The private security industry is a provider of security systems
such as burglar alarms and closed-circuit television cameras (CCTV),
with the latter being seen as increasingly important in combating crime.
--Increasingly, insurance companies are insisting on private
security measures such as links with armed response.
Some private security companies claim that in their areas of
operation, crime has been reduced to between 75 per cent and 90 per
cent. (31))
6.2 Potential role
It has been stated that the distinction between public and private
policing has already become blurred since armed response services
rendered by private security companies already imply performing some
traditional police duties. The same applies to the patrolling of certain
streets by private security officers. Functions such as eviction and the
policing of illegal strikes have also involved private security. (32))
Although the extension of the powers of private security has
received considerable attention, it is stressed that the primary role of
private security is to serve a specific client for profit. Assisting
more actively in combating crime in general would therefore be a
secondary role, The Security Officers' Board nevertheless submitted
a policy paper to Government inter alia requesting peace officer status
for certain categories of private security guards. This would include
full powers of arrest, search and seizure. (33))
Although no formal co-operation agreement exists between the SAPS
and the private security industry, it has been reported that the SAPS
views the provision of crime intelligence and information, as well as a
visible presence by private security, as important factors in combating
crime. On local level, some informal co-operation does exist, for
example in various Cape Town suburbs. (34)) An indication has been given
that the SAPS Commissioner would meet with representatives of the
Regulatory Authority to discuss formal co-operation, but this does not
seem to have materialised yet.
A number of other potential roles have also been suggested by
academics and analysts. These include the following: (35))
--Forensic investigations, such as the photographing of crime
scenes on behalf of the SAPS.
--Criminal investigations which are already being carried out by
private security (for example regarding commercial crime) could be
expanded to include crimes where specialised detection skills are
required and where this is available in the private sector.
--Transporting prisoners.
--Guards for state-owned premises and for individual state
officials still guarded by the SAPS.
--Increased responsibility for security at private functions such
as sport events.
--Aspects of police officer training.
--Court-orderly duties.
Some other potential functions have also been suggested such as
certain justice and prison-related activities, but the point is that
where some of these functions are out-sourced, these need not
necessarily be to private security companies.
7. PROBLEMATIC ISSUES
A number of problematic issues, however, surround the idea of an
expanded role for private security, Firstly, the issue of cost.
Taxpayers may well argue that they are entitled to better policing.
Forcing the public (and only some can afford it) to rely increasingly on
private security, could be viewed as a dereliction of government
responsibilities. In this regard the following has been remarked:
"Meanwhile, at the beginning of the year most monitoring and armed
reaction companies raised their fees quite steeply--in some cases as
much as 25 per cent. This is way ahead of the inflation rate and is
quite alarming.... Far from being a boon, security is becoming a problem
in that its cost is constantly increasing". (36)) Recent mergers in
the security industry could strengthen the trend towards monopolies and
higher costs. It is estimated that the number of major operators could
decrease from 12 in 2001 to about five in 2005. (37))
Secondly, it has been stated that "private security companies
police for profit and are accountable to their clients. Extending the
power of private security guards will effectively give those who employ
these guards, powers and rights the general public will not have".
(38))
Thirdly, while the police are accountable to various levels of
government and the electorate, private security companies are primarily
accountable to their clients and shareholders. (39))
Fourthly, the fact that the deterrence of crime is enhanced by the
arrest and punishment of criminals, in which the police play a major
role, is contrasted with the fact that although visible private security
also has a deterrent effect, the main objective of the latter is
reduction of the risk of crime and loss. Furthermore the increased
establishment of "enclaves" protected by private security
could merely lead to crime relocating to other areas that are not
protected in this manner. (40))
Other issues that are mentioned (also in the context of the current
role of private security) include the following: (41))
--Overburdening of the police who respond to false alarms that are
not linked to reaction and do not always meet acceptable security
equipment standards.
--Training standards which, although regulated by the security
industry, are sometimes viewed as inadequate. This especially applies to
firearm training and the training of grade D and E guards.
--Criminal behaviour by security officers, such as involvement in
cash-in-transit robbery, housebreaking, etc, as well as other improper
conduct (for example, between 1995 and 2000, 1 835 improper conduct
enquiries were instituted).
--Underpayment of guards which led to a major strike during 2001.
--The use of unregistered security officers.
--The ability of the private security industry to cope with
increasingly violent, more sophisticated and large-scale attacks, such
as cash-in-transit robberies.
--Unfavourable ratios of 800 to 1 400 customers per single armed
reaction vehicle in some cases.
It should of course be taken into account that many police officers
are not well-trained either, with approximately one third of the SAPS
currently illiterate. Significant numbers of police officers are also
facing criminal charges or disciplinary hearings. (42)) The absence of a
permanent solution to crime in South Africa also results in a situation
where there is a shift in crime from targets protected by private
security to softer targets. (43))
A number of issues were also raised in reaction to the publication
of the first draft of the Security Industry Regulation Bill. The South
African Police Union (SAPU) objected to the prohibition on inter alia
members of the police and the military to register as security officers.
The long delays in the registering of new security officers with the
former Security Officers' Board was also mentioned. (44))
Subsequently, dissatisfaction with the functioning of the Security
Industry Regulatory Authority has been expressed on a number of
occasions. (45))
8. CONCLUSION
In the policy paper submitted to the Minister of Safety and
Security by the Security Officers' Interim Board during 2000, it
was stated that "(t)he Board proceeds from the premise that the
strategic crime prevention and crime fighting roles of private security
will continue to expand in the foreseeable future". (46)) An appeal
was also made for a "working partnership" between public
police and private security, and it was stated that the strategic
importance of the security industry is self-evident from a safety and
security perspective. (47))
Undoubtedly private security does contribute to the prevention of
crime, and in fact may, if the service had not existed, also have led to
an increase in vigilante actions. It is nevertheless clear that private
security cannot replace public policing and also that a formal
co-operation agreement between the police and the private security
industry on national level is not imminent. The increased and more
efficient regulation of the private security industry as envisaged in
the Private Security Industry Regulation Act, 2001 will hopefully also
lead to higher standards of service and professionalism in the industry,
and contribute to its ability to play an important role in the combating
of crime. A realisation that crime in South Africa is not only a threat
to human security but more specifically that the extent of serious crime
has implications for national security, is required as a first step in
the more effective combating of crime, also by the official policing
agencies.
Table 1:
Operational Results: Rural Safeguarding
Financial Year
Focus Area 2001/2002 2002/2003
Stolen vehicles recovered 167 698
Illegal immigrants apprehended 11 129 10 185
Narcotics in tablet form confiscated 320 7 973
Narcotics--dagga confiscated 11 851 kg 93 922 kg
Illegal and unlicensed firearms confiscated 520 2 071
Stolen stock recovered 919 2 008
Suspects arrested 2 500 10 169
Table 2:
Operational Results: Borderline Control
Financial Year
Focus Area 2001/2002 2002/2003
Stolen vehicles recovered 138 196
Illegal immigrants apprehended 63 186 47 323
Narcotics in tablet form confiscated 20 586 2
Narcotics--dagga confiscated 40 342 kg 18 788 kg
Illegal and unlicensed firearms confiscated 214 133
Stolen stock recovered 661 229
Suspects arrested 822 523
REGISTERED CATEGORIES OF PRIVATE SECURITY SERVICES
IN SOUTH AFRICA
Security services Number of
security
businesses
Guarding and/or patrolling: Commercial, industrial or 3 014
residential
Safeguarding assets in transit, providing security 685
transport
Providing close personal protection / body guarding 946
Providing advice on the protection of persons or property, 335
any other security service or the use of security
equipment
Providing reaction or response services 339
Ensuring safety and order on premises (sporting, 984
recreational and entertainment)
Manufacturing, importing, distributing or advertising of 141
monitoring devices
Functioning as private investigators 855
Providing security training or instruction 951
Installing, servicing or repairing security equipment 428
Providing services of a locksmith 260
Monitoring signals from electronic security equipment 1 111
(security control room)
Making persons or their services available for rendering a 994
security service
Providing security at special events 676
Car watch or related activities 223
Source: Private Security Industry Regulatory Authority, Research
Enquiry, 28 August 2003.
* This article is an updated version of ISSUP Bulletin 4/2002,
originally written by Col Barry Schoeman, Senior Staff Officer,
Operations Land Internal and Borderline Control, Joint Operations
Division, SA National Defence Force.
# Updated version of an article first published in the Strategic
Review for Southern Africa, Vol XXIV, No 2, November 2002.
REFERENCES
(1.) United Nations Development Programme, Human Development Report
1994, Oxford University Press, 1994, pp 24-25.
(2.) Ayoob, M, The Third World security predicatment: State making,
regional conflict and the international system, Lynne Rienner, London,
1995, p 19.
(3.) Organisation of African Unity, Memorandum of Understanding on
Security, Stability, Development and Cooperation in Africa (CSSDCA),
July 2002.
(4.) Organisation of African Unity, CSSDCA, Solemn Declaration,
AHF/Decl.4 (XXXVI), July 2000.
(5.) Paris, R, "Human Security: Paradigm Shift or Hot
Air?", International Security, Vol 26, No 2, 2001, pp 89 and 92.
(6.) Khong, Y F "Human Security: A Shotgun Approach to
Alleviating Human Misery?, Global Governance, Vol 7, No 3, 2001, pp
231-234.
(7.) Buzan, B, People, States and Fear, Second Edition, Harvester
Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hampstead, 1991, pp 112-116.
(8.) Bosch, J G S, "The role and structure of the private
security industry in South Africa", ISSUP Bulletin 3/99, 1999, p 4.
(9.) Republic of South Africa, Private Security Industry Regulation
Act, 2001 (Act No 56 of 2001), section 1.
(10.) Ibid, sections 1 and 20.
(11.) Bosch, J G S, op cit, p 5.
(12.) Ibid, pp 5-6.
(13.) Ibid, pp 6-7.
(14.) Private Security Industry Regulatory Authority, Research
Enquiry, 19 September 2002 and 28 August 2003; and Security Focus, May
2003, p 4.
(15.) Security Focus, January 2003, p 4.
(16.) SAPS Profile, http://www.saps.gov.za/profile.
(17.) Nhlanhla, J, "Challenges facing the Intelligence
Community in South Africa", ISSUP Bulletin, 6/95, 1995, p 3.
(18.) Mti, L M, "The role of the Intelligence Services and
private security companies in crime prevention and crime combating in
South Africa", ISSUP Bulletin, 5/97, 1997, pp 12-13.
(19.) Ibid, pp 10-11.
(20.) Republic of South Africa, General Intelligence Law Amendment
Ac> 2000 (Act No 66 of 2000), section 22E.
(21.) Beeld (Johannesburg), 20 April 2000.
(22.) Business Day (Johannesburg), 27 September 2001.
(23.) Republic of South Africa, Private Security Industry
Regulation Act, 2001, op cit, section 23.
(24.) Republic of South Africa, Security Officers Ac> 1987 (Act
No 92 of 1987), section 3.
(25.) Republic of South Africa, Government Gazette, No 14178, 31
July 1992.
(26.) Republic of South Africa, Security Officers Amendment Act
1997 (Act No 104 of 1997), section 12.
(27.) Republic of South Africa, Private Security Industry
Regulation Act, 2001, op cit, section 3.
(28.) Ibid, section 28.
(29.) Republic of South Africa, Criminal Procedure Act, 1977 (Act
No 51 of 1977).
(30.) Schonteich, M, "Fighting crime with private muscle: The
private sector and crime prevention", African Security Review, Vol
8, No 5, 1999, p 67.
(31.) Business Report (Johannesburg), 6 December 2001.
(32.) Irish, J, "Policing for profit", ISS Monograph
Series, No 39, August 1999, p 29; and The Star (Johannesburg), 9 March
2001.
(33.) Security Officers' Board, Policy Paper, 21 May 2000, p
220.
(34.) Schonteich, M, op cit, p 68; and Security Focus, January
2003, p 44.
(35.) Minnaar, A, "Partnership policing", African
Security Review, Vol 8, No 2, 1999, pp 45-46.
(36.) Security Focus, April, Vol 18, No 4, 2000, p 4.
(37.) Business Report (Johannesburg), 6 December 2001.
(38.) Irish, J, op cit, p 30.
(39.) Ibid, p 9.
(40.) Ibid, pp 9-11.
(41.) Minnaar, A, op cit, pp 46-49; Beeld (Johannesburg), 7 March
2001; Beeld (Johannesburg), 6 March 2001; The Star (Johannesburg), 4
January 2001; Security Officers' Interim Board, Statistics for
2000, March 2001; and Business Report (Johannesburg), 6 December 2001.
(42.) Rapport (Johannesburg), 25 February 2001.
(43.) Business Report (Johannesburg), 6 December 2001.
(44.) Sake Beeld (Johannesburg), 29 August 2000.
(45.) See for instance Security Focus, May 2003, p 4.
(46.) Security Officers' Board, Policy Paper, op cit, p 4.
(47.) Ibid, p 39.